Thursday, October 25, 2018

When Trump Phones Friends, the Chinese and the Russians Listen and Learn

“When President Trump calls old friends on one of his unsecured iPhones, U.S. intelligence reports indicate that Chinese spies are often listening.

Mr. Trump’s aides have repeatedly warned him that his cellphone calls are not secure, and they have told him that Russian spies are routinely eavesdropping on the calls, as well. But aides say the president has still refused to give up his iPhones."

The full article is available here

Tuesday, October 23, 2018

Trump: "I'm A Nationalist, Not A Globalist" = Not Good For Democracy

President Trump openly identifies himself as a nationalist, calls for the jailing of his political opponents, puts children in cages, mocks the disabled and rape victims, attacks the free press and cozies up to dictators, while the Republicans who control Congress stand idly by.

Nationalism is NOT patriotism. Real patriotism involves strengthening our democracy, defending the ideals we share in common, and protecting the rights of all. Nationalism is rooted in fear and division. We must reject it.

Citation: https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/412649-trump-you-know-what-i-am-im-a-nationalist

Monday, October 22, 2018

Global “War on Drugs” Terrible at Eradicating Drugs, But Great at Upending Societies: Report

International group calls for a major rethink of global policy on narcotics and an end to the failed efforts that governments refuse to relinquish.

Another major study designed to assess how national governments wage their so-called "war on drugs" shows that the last tens years of such policies have not only failed to put a dent in the illegal drug trade, the tactics have had serious negative impacts for global health, human rights, public safety and economic progress.

Moreover, current drug policies are a serious obstacle to other social and economical objectives. The “war on drugs” has resulted in millions of people murdered, disappeared, or internally displaced.

The full article is available here

Saturday, October 13, 2018

Melania Caught In Lie About " I Really Don't Care" Jacket

1. At the time, her office vehemently denied she wore it intentionally. She just proved that they weren’t telling the truth.
2. Wearing it while going to visit children separated from their parents isn’t just naive or tone deaf; it’s downright insulting and inhumane.
3. It’s not just “left wing” media that criticizes her. Plenty of mainstream media does too, as well as some principled conservative journalists.

The full article is available here

Thursday, October 11, 2018

Trump cites Saudi arms deal with U.S. to downplay apparent murder of journalist

"Trump’s financial relationship with Saudi Arabia goes beyond arms sales. As the Washington Post reported in August, the Saudi regime has been pumping money directly into Trump’s pockets through his hotels.”

Trump admits he doesn't want to hold Saudi Arabia accountable for dissident journalist's (who was a permanent U.S. resident) apparent murder by Saudi Arabia’s regime ... because the U.S. makes too much money from arms sales to the Saudi’s (including weapons being used to committee atrocities and exacerbate a humanitarian in Yemen).

It ALMOST like he’s ok with journalists being attacked and harmed 🤔

The full article is available here

Wednesday, October 10, 2018

EPA Chief Andrew Wheeler Engaged With Racist, Conspiratorial Posts On Social Media



“Trump’s EPA Chief Andrew Wheeler engaged with racist and conspiratorial right wing posts on social media. He has brushed off his interactions with a Pizzagater and said he doesn’t remember liking a racist picture of the Obamas.”

This kind of nonsense seems to be a feature of the Trump administration, not a bug.

The full article is available here

Monday, October 8, 2018

Kremlin created a fake ‘manspreading’ video — and conservative media in the US helped it go viral

“Conservative media in the U.S. - including The Blaze (founded by Glenn Beck), The Daily Wire (founded by Ben Shapiro) - helped spread a Russian-created fake video against ‘manspreading’ that resulted in a misogynistic backlash against women.”

U.S. conservative media continues to be an easy mark for Russian psy ops.

The full article is available here

Friday, October 5, 2018

The Truth About False Rape Accusations - BBC News

Over the past 20 years, only 2-10% of rape accusations are proven to be fake, argue the authors of a 2010 US study.

Official figures suggest the number of rapes and sexual assaults which are never even reported or prosecuted far outweighs the number of men convicted of rape because of fake accusations.

We should be skeptical of the notion that it is common for women to say they've been sexually abused when they haven't.

It's not.

The full article is available here

Thursday, October 4, 2018

“We Need to Destroy the Republican Party”: A Conservative Luminary Calls for a Clean Start

Best-selling author and conservative columnist Max Boot discusses his realizations that ‬the GOP has been using racism as campaigning technique since Nixon, that the Iraq War was wrong and he was wrong about it, and how Trumpism is a cancer that needs to be defeated by straight-ticket voting for Democrats.

The full article is available here

Tuesday, September 25, 2018

Poland’s right-wing government is rewriting history — with itself as hero - Washington Post

In his recent speech at the United Nations, President Donald Trump said, “In Poland the great people are standing up for their independence, their security, and their sovereignty."

You read that correctly. The President of the United States was cheering a far right regime that is systematically attacking democracy in Poland.

The full article is available here 

Wednesday, September 12, 2018

Kavanaugh Thinks It’s Okay to Perform Elective Surgery on People Without Their Consent - Talk Poverty

As a Judge in D.C. Circuit Court, [SCOTUS nominee] Kavanaugh argued that people with disabilities could be forced to undergo elective surgeries, INCLUDING ABORTION, without their consent.

The full article is available here

Friday, August 31, 2018

U.S. is denying passports to Americans along the border, throwing their citizenship into question - Washington Post

“In some cases, passport applicants WITH OFFICIAL U.S. BIRTH CERTIFICATES are being jailed in immigration detention centers and entered into deportation proceedings.”

The full article is available here

Saturday, August 18, 2018

Our Modern Minds Are Coarsened, Yet There Is Reason For Hope - Kirk J Schneider

Too many of us have become calculative and consumerist giants but emotional and imaginative dwarfs, steely and impenetrable, but bereft of nuance, attunement, and depth;  and this is precisely our dilemma.

Lots of caring, thoughtful people are looking at the current state of the world, wringing their hands asking “how in the world we got here?”

Perhaps the more accurate question is “Why, given our mercantile-materialist past, shouldn’t we have gotten here?” 

In his 1978 book The Illusion of Technique, public philosopher William Barrett forewarned of the damage being done through our reliance on devices - rather than people - to solve our moral predicaments; and we should have paid more attention.

Today we are stained with the legacy of our civilization falling under the spell of a “machine model for living.”  This model emphasized efficiency (or what many called efficiency): speed, instant results, appearance and packaging; and it lured millions to the marketplace–or killing fields.

The result however was anything but “efficient” in the larger sense.

We created ease and convenience, to be sure.  But the advances were largely external - relegated to how fast we drove, how quickly we ate, how many gadgets we owned or people we manipulated; but our interior life, our capacity to feel and reflect and communicate was left bereft.

The result is that, today, too many of us have become calculative and consumerist giants but emotional and imaginative dwarfs, steely and impenetrable, but bereft of nuance, attunement, and depth; and this is precisely our dilemma.
                                                                                                                      ...

From my standpoint as a psychologist, there are two likely outcomes issuing from this dilemma: 

  1. our citizenry will devolve into drone-like functionaries, programmed for elemental self-interest, or ...
  2. we will confront the moral crisis of our time - the quick fix/instant results society - and engage our abilities to be more fully present, both to ourselves and those about us. 

The type of engagement in the latter will take time–more like what we see consistently in psychotherapeutic settings, but it will help us see each other as complex human beings; persons both unique and yet alike.

The full article is available here

Wednesday, August 8, 2018

What's Driving The Migration Crisis At Our Southern Border? WBUR

“As long as the root causes - including the major role the U.S. has and continues to play in the region’s pervasive violence, terror and systemic poverty - are not addressed, Central Americans will continue to flee and make the perilous trek north.”

Relatively little reporting has focused on the reasons why thousands of Central Americans are fleeing their homes in the first place.

As long as the root causes - including the major role the U.S. has and continues to play in the region’s pervasive violence, terror and systemic poverty - are not addressed, Central Americans will continue to flee and make the perilous trek north.

Legacy of U.S. intervention
The factors causing this migration are both historical and recent, but a persistent thread is the legacy of U.S. intervention. The U.S. was heavily involved in supporting the military, right-wing government and death squads in the civil wars in Guatemala and El Salvador during the 1980’s and 1990’s, which killed 200,000 and 75,000 respectively.

The Rise of Gangs
The legacy of the civil conflicts in Central America and the massive displacement they caused have contributed to the rise of criminal gangs.  Today, high murder rates in the Northern Triangle are blamed on a war between two rival gangs, MS-13 and Barrio 18, both of which have their roots in the U.S. Because of government corruption, severe poverty and lack of opportunities, conditions were ripe for this exported gang culture to proliferate.

Political, social, and economic volatility
While home invasions, sexual assault, kidnapping, drug trafficking and petty crime levels are high, police forces are inadequately funded, trained and equipped. Government corruption and collusion means that the vast majority of crimes are not prosecuted.

Damaging trade agreements
Another factor driving the high rates of migration is the presence of transnational corporations and the trade agreements that facilitate their activities, include sweatshop economies which deny living wages to their workers.

To make matters worse, U.S. immigration policies continue to exacerbate all the factors driving people to leave the region.  As U.S. citizens, we need to be better informed about our own country's contribution to this ongoing exodus and demand that their elected officials end the U.S. role in unfair trade practices, repressive regimes and border policies.

The full article is available here

Wednesday, August 1, 2018

Reporting on "Medicare for All" Makes Media Forget How Math Works - Fairness and Accuracy In Reporting

Missing from neagtive headlines about the "Medicare For All" plan was the fact that it's projected to cost $2.1 trillion less than projections of spending under the current US healthcare system.

“Medicare for All,” a federally funded universal healthcare plan championed by Sen. Bernie Sanders (Vermont–Ind.), has quickly become a key issue for progressive voters evaluating Democratic Party candidates for the 2018 midterm elections and the 2020 presidential race.

A study projected that Sanders’ Medicare for All system, assuming it was enacted in 2022, would cost the federal government a whopping $32.6 trillion in excess spending over the course of 10 years.

Missing from the negative headlines about this plan was an important point in Blahous’ study: In terms of total (federal, state and private) spending on healthcare, Sanders’ Medicare for All plan is actually projected to cost $2.1 trillion less than projections of spending under the current US healthcare system.

And, of course, the media chorus complaining about how much a program like Medicare for All adds to the federal debt fades to a whimper when it comes to enacting trillion-dollar tax cuts for the rich, providing billions in corporate welfare, or for continuing to fight endless and fruitless overseas wars with America’s $700 billion–a–year military budget.

The full article is available here

Dinesh D’Souza’s Fraudulent 'Death Of A Nation' - AV Club Review

To thoroughly unpack the falsehoods, rhetorical sleights of hand, goalpost shifting, and general bad-faith arguments would require a monograph. 

Fresh off his presidential pardon from Trump for a campaign-finance violation, D’Souza is angrier than ever - but still up to his usual practice of rearranging standard right-wing talking points into startlingly illogical new configurations in his film Death Of A Nation.

To thoroughly unpack the falsehoods, rhetorical sleights of hand, goalpost shifting, and general bad-faith arguments would require a monograph.

One example will suffice: To prove that Hitler wasn’t a “right-winger” but truly belongs to the left, D’Souza notes that the dictator is often deemed right-wing because he’s perceived as homophobic. (Well, yes.)

But in fact, that’s incorrect, because Hitler tolerated homosexuals in the brownshirts as long as they were good fighters; ergo, he wasn’t homophobic, and by extension he’s not right-wing.

Beyond the ridiculousness of the claim, D’Souza either missed the logical conclusion of his own argument—that to be right-wing is to be homophobic—or hopes the audience doesn’t clock the trap he’s set for himself.

That’s typical of D’Souza’s whirlwind barrage of assertions: One minute we’re learning that FDR thought of Mussolini as a kindred spirit, the next that the Nazi party program sounds like it was jointly written by Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders because it has a healthcare plank.

The full article is available here

Tuesday, July 31, 2018

Trump & Sessions Ignored Warning Of Psychological Harm To Children With Zero Tolerance Policy - PBS News Hour

“Jonathan White of Health & Human Services warned President Trump & AG Jeff Sessions about ‘significant risk of harm’ & ‘psychological injury’ to children affected by their new zero tolerance border policy ... and was ignored.”

The full article is available here


Friday, July 27, 2018

New Study connects U.S. Citizen Racial/Cultural Intolerance & Support For Authoritarianism


A new study finds a correlation between U.S. citizen’s racial and cultural intolerance, and support for authoritarian rule.  The data shows that when intolerant U.S. citizens fear that democracy may benefit marginalized people groups, they abandon their commitment to democracy.

The growing concentration of racially and culturally intolerant voters in the Republican Party has created a party whose workings appear less and less committed to a democratic society.

When faced with a choice between bigotry and democracy, too many U.S. citizens are embracing the first while abandoning the second.
The full article is available here

Wednesday, July 25, 2018

Cohen Tape: Further Evidence Trump Committed 'Felony Campaign Finance Violation'

A secret payment to keep an alleged affair quiet, designed to help the Trump campaign and not properly disclosed, violates federal campaign finance laws. Because the amount exceeded $25,000, it would be punishable as a felony (as was the $130,000 payment to Stormy Daniels). 

In the unwieldy tape, Cohen and Trump appear to be discussing plans to set up a shell company to buy the rights to story of Karen McDougal, a former Playboy model who alleges she had an affair with Trump.

The story was purchased by American Media Inc. (AMI)—the parent company of the National Enquirer—for $150,000.  (The Enquirer never ran the story, a fact that many argue strongly suggests that the tabloid killed it at Trump's behest).

Cohen's tape appears to contradict repeated claims by the president's team that Trump had no knowledge of any payments to silence McDougal.

Lawmakers and ethics experts argued that the newly released audio provides evidence of a serious campaign finance violation.

Journalist David Atkins said, "On the tape, Cohen and Trump are discussing a conspiracy to repay a tabloid owner for buying and shelving a story by the candidate's mistress. Which is not only a major scandal, but a felony campaign finance violation."

The full article is available here

Monday, July 23, 2018

Did My Family Really Come “Legally”? - Today’s Immigration Laws Created a New Reality

Until the late 19th century, there was very little federal regulation of immigration—there were virtually no laws to break.

Today’s laws require that potential immigrants be closely related to qualified U.S. citizens or permanent residents, have employment offers from U.S. employers, or qualify as refugees.

Today’s laws would have effectively restricted many of our families that immigrated before the passage of those laws from coming legally to the United States.

Until the late 19th century, there was very little federal regulation of immigration—there were virtually no laws to break. The U.S. was a growing, increasingly industrialized nation that needed workers, and immigration was “encouraged and virtually unfettered."

When many families arrived in the United States, there were no numerical limitations on immigration, no requirements to have an existing family or employment relationship with someone in the country, and no requirement to obtain a visa prior to arriving.

Before the 20th century, there was virtually no bureaucracy responsible for enforcing immigration laws. The first numerical caps on immigration and limitations on Europeans were not established until the 1920s—after the great wave of immigration to the United States.

Acknowledging the large numbers of Europeans in the United States without proper authorization, the 1929 Registry Act allowed “honest law-abiding alien[s] who may be in the country under some merely technical irregularity” to register as permanent residents for a fee of $20 if they could prove they had lived in the country since 1921 and were of “good moral character.” 

The full article is available here

Saturday, July 21, 2018

Alleged Russian Spy Was Working to Infiltrate Religious Right As Well As Gun Groups

Why would Russian espionage efforts target the US Christian Right?  Well, the affection with which some Christian right figures hold Russia and specifically the LGBTQ-persecuting policies of Putin is hardly a secret.

(For more on how the National Prayer Breakfast was the perfect shady venue for Russians to connect with the NRA and Trump, head here)

In 2015, alleged Russian spy Butina and her associate, U.S. political operative Paul Erickson, appeared on the radio show of conservative evangelical superstar (and big-time Trump promoter) Eric Metaxas to discuss gun rights and religious freedom — topics that are strangely congruent in the conservative Christian circles in which all these birds flew.

But why would Russian espionage efforts target the US Christian Right?  Well, the affection with which some Christian right figures hold Russia and specifically the LGBTQ-persecuting policies of Putin is hardly a secret.

Putin’s evangelical fan club includes some pretty big names, like conservative Evangelical leader Franklin Graham, National Organization for Marriage leader Brian Brown, and American Family Association spokesperson Bryan Fischer.

In almost every case it has been his distinctive combination of homophobia and Islamophobia that has made Putin popular with those men. The cultural conservative preference for authoritarian moralism is echoed to the former KGB officer who has revived Russia’s pre-communist tradition of militantly authoritarian Christianity.

The full article is available here

Thursday, July 19, 2018

"Totalitarianism For Christ:" How National Prayer Breakfast Plays Into Indictment Of Alleged Russian Spy

The National Prayer Breakfast is organized by "The Family," a powerful and secretive Washington DC lobby that pursues what they've described as "totalitarianism for Christ." The Family frequently uses the National Prayer Breakfast, and the week surrounding it, as a means of back-channel engagement with lobbyists and foreign governments that organizers feel share its “strongman” approach, without formal government oversight.

Maria Butina, a Russian graduate student at American University and gun rights activist, was arrested and accused of “acting as an agent for a foreign government.”

One of the most striking elements of Butina’s case was the venue she allegedly chose to exert influence: the National Prayer Breakfast. At the 2016 and 2017 events, Butina allegedly met with unnamed American officials and “very influential” Russians, and seems to have successfully attempted to broker meetings between figures in these groups.

The National Prayer Breakfast is organized by "The Family," also known as "C Street." It is a powerful right wing organization that claims to be Christian, but who have an erroneous view of Jesus as the ideal “strongman,” an idea they've also referred to as "Totalitarianism For Christ."  (The founders of this group were great admirers of the European Fascism of the 1930's).

In strongman-sympathetic President Trump, The Family has found an ideal vessel for their beliefs.

The Family frequently uses the National Prayer Breakfast, and the week surrounding it, as a backdoor recruiting and diplomacy tool, often using the events around the breakfast as a means of back-channel engagement with lobbyists and foreign governments that organizers feel share its “strongman” approach, without formal government oversight.

The Family's distorted belief that Jesus was a strongman guides their understanding that if you're in power, it's because God puts you there. Their efforts to work with Russian dictator Vladimir Putin are going on in the context of a growing U.S. Christian Right admiration for Putin over the past decade. 

The full article is available here

Thursday, July 5, 2018

Authoritarianism Making A Comeback In West. Here's the time-tested way to defeat it - The Guardian

Authoritarians' tactics require the consent of large numbers of people.
The first lesson, then, is not to obey in advance.


Modern authoritarians rely on repression, intimidation, corruption and co-optation to consolidate their power. Good citizens will then ask: "but what should we do?" History provides an answer: civil resistance.

Civil resistance works by separating the authoritarian ruler from pillars of support, including economic elites, security forces, and government workers. It attracts diverse groups in society, whose collective defiance and stubbornness eventually elicits power shifts.

Unarmed civilians using petitions, boycotts, strikes, and other nonviolent methods have been able to slow, disrupt and even halt authoritarianism. Civil resistance has been twice as effective as armed struggle.

The dictator’s handbook mastered by Orban in Hungary, Erdogan in Turkey, Maduro in Venezuela, Putin in Russia, Zuma in South Africa, Duterte in the Philippines (and being flirted with by Trump in the US) provides the traditional tactics:
  • attack journalists 
  • blame dissent on foreigners and “paid protestors” 
  • scapegoat minorities and vulnerable groups 
  • weaken checks on power 
  • reward loyalists 
  • use paramilitaries 
  • reduce politics to a question of friends and enemies, us and them.

The full article is available here

Saturday, June 30, 2018

If Trump Really Meant "Make America Great Again" - Jeff Wiersma


Clarity About News-Unreliability of Fox - Heather Cox Richardson

Watch the opinion programming on Fox "News" Channel if you want, but recognize that it is not informed by facts or real investigations; it is designed purely to hold audiences by ginning up outrage.

If someone is repeating a story that seems crazy - it probably is, and you would be crazy to believe it.

The full article is available here

Friday, June 22, 2018

Illegal Immigration Does Not Increase Violent Crime, 4 Studies Show - NPR

Motivated by Trump's rhetoric, social scientists set out to answer this question: Are undocumented immigrants more likely to break the law? 

4 academic studies show that illegal immigration does not increase the prevalence of violent crime or drug or alcohol use.

Michael Light, a criminologist at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, looked at whether the soaring increase in illegal immigration over the last three decades caused a commensurate jump in violent crimes: murder, rape, robbery and aggravated assault.

"Increased undocumented immigration since 1990 has not increased violent crime over that same time period," Light said
The full article is available here

Friday, June 1, 2018

The Tired Trope of Blaming Trump on ‘Liberal Smugness’ - Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting

The “liberal smugness” op-ed press narrative - rather than acknowledging that sexism and racism remain very real and pernicious phenomena in our society - treat the words as mere insults that the left manipulatively and indiscriminately lobs at conservatives for almost every little thing they do.

In an attempt to understand the coalition that gave Trump his narrow 2016 election victory, for the past year and a half the press has spun a whole new subgenre of stilted, tautological feature reporting on how Trump supporters support Trump.

They have routinely given platforms to those who claim, with little to no firm evidence, that Trump’s election and his steady (though historically low) popularity (as well as his predicted eventual reelection) are all partly if not wholly the fault of liberal smugness and left-wing political correctness run amok.

The proof presented in these arguments is routinely shot through with logical holes that go unaddressed. Rather than acknowledging that sexism and racism remain very real and pernicious phenomena in our society, these op-eds typically treat the words as mere insults that the left manipulatively and indiscriminately lobs at conservatives for almost every little thing they do.

Might “liberal condescension” just be a convenient fig leaf for hardened, motivated reasoning from an older, white demographic that is already heavily predisposed to like Trump, regardless of what liberals say? You won’t find any answers to legitimate questions like that here or elsewhere in these feckless claims.

Time and again, any underlying racism or discriminatory policies cited by liberals are treated as mere pretense to stigmatize those on the right. This manifests itself in almost absurdly reductive ways.

University of Maryland working paper that studied reactions to the 2016 election cast doubt on the premise of liberal shaming driving conservatives further toward the right. As it noted, there was no statistically significant evidence of a backlash by conservative voters when confronted with liberal critiques of Trump being racist.

In fact, the paper found that conservative racial animus in response to liberal election messaging was rooted in pre-existing biases, which is why those same conservatives also rejected claims of Trump’s racism that came from Republicans.

The full article is available here

What To Know About Families Separated By New Trump "Zero Tolerance" Policy - World Relief's Matthew Soerens

While children and parents have sometimes been separated under past administrations, the Trump administration's new "zero tolerance" policy is dramatically increasing these instances.

The Trump administration is not taking into account the effect of such prosecutions on vulnerable children. So children who arrived with one or both parents are being classified as “unaccompanied” once their parents are charged and detained. They are then processed in the same way as a child who arrives at the border without any parent.  


On May 7, 2018, Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced a new “zero tolerance” policy to criminally charge anyone caught seeking to enter the United States without proper documentation—even in cases when the individual or families are seeking asylum.

In every other administration, the Department of Justice has exercised prosecutorial discretion, criminally charging those entering improperly in some cases, but also taking into account the effect of such prosecutions on vulnerable children.  Chief of Staff John Kelly has said this new policy of separating children is designed to serve as a deterrent from those who would consider coming to the US.

Since children cannot be criminally charged when their parents are, this policy inherently means that children—even very small children—are being taken from their parents. According to recent testimony from an official with US Customs and Border Protection, during just the first two weeks of this new policy, 638 parents were prosecuted, affecting 658 children. While children and parents have sometimes been separated under past administrations, this new policy is dramatically increasing these instances.

These children, who arrived with one or both parents, are then classified as “unaccompanied” once their parents are charged and detained. They are then processed in the same way as a child who arrives at the border without any parent.

The new “zero tolerance” policy, which is leading to children being separated from their parents and classified as “unaccompanied,” will likely mean a significant increase in the number of children being transferred to the custody of Health and Human Services and in need of a sponsor. This increases the possibility for unintentional trauma for children who are already fleeing violence or the threat of violence in their home countries.


Under the Trump Administration, the US Refugee Resettlement Program has dramatically reduced the admission of refugees to the US from almost all countries. In 2018, the U.S. is on track to receive only about 22% as many individual as in 2016. Arrivals from almost all countries of origin, including those from El Salvador, Honduras and Guatemala, are down significantly. And the Central American Migrant parole program has been terminated altogether.

With far less hope of a safe, legal option to seek refuge, more desperate families facing threats of violence in their home country feel there is no choice but to seek to arrive unlawfully—only to be separated from their family if they make it.

The full article is available here



Tuesday, May 22, 2018

No links between Ritalin and school shootings, as NRA's Oliver North claimed - Politifact

Politifact "found no evidence to back up the idea that ADHD medication was behind school shootings or that "many" shooters had been on Ritalin."

The National Rifle Association’s new president, Oliver North, deflected attention off guns and onto medication in the wake of the latest school shooting.

North said, "They have been drugged in many cases … many of these young boys have been on Ritalin since they were in kindergarten."

The overprescription of ADHD medication has been the subject of heavy debate. For the record, we found no evidence that the suspected Texas shooter was diagnosed with ADHD, or prescribed Ritalin.

More broadly and to North’s point, we found no evidence to back up the idea that ADHD medication was behind school shootings or that "many" shooters had been on Ritalin.

A minor percentage of school shooters studied had been medicated, not "many." The notion that many have specifically been on the drug Ritalin since kindergarten has no factual basis. More broadly, causation has never been established between the medication and violence.

The full article is available here

Saturday, May 12, 2018

The Irrational Fear of Islamic Terrorism in U.S. - Jeremy Henzell-Thomas in Tikkun Magazine

The actual threat to the US ‘homeland’ of terrorist groups like Islamic State has been consistently magnified wildly out of proportion by US media.  Anti-Islamic prejudice about terrorism has become a narrative fallacy - a flawed story that shapes our views of the world and expectations of the future.

The inflated, irrational fear of Islamic Terrorism has reached a stage in our national consciousness where it has become an identifiable pathology, whose main symptoms are irrational prejudice, a constant feeling of threat, and an incapacitating sense of isolation.

Adam Johnson, a contributing analyst for FAIR.org (Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting), has contended that the actual threat to the US ‘homeland’ of terrorist groups like Islamic State has been ‘consistently magnified wildly out of proportion by US media.

Johnson cites many examples brought to light by FAIR over the years of how the media unfairly reserve the word ‘terrorism’ overwhelmingly for political violence leveled by Muslims.

A couple of pieces of data illustrate how people in the U.S. aren't interested in anything other than having their existing biases about Muslims confirmed.

* When you look at the majority of terrorist attacks in the United States, according to the FBI, the majority of domestic U.S. terror attacks are actually committed by white, male Christians. When those things occur, we don’t suspect other people who are from the same faith tradition and ethnicity of condoning them. We assume that these things outrage them just as much as they do anyone else. And we have to afford this same assumption of innocence to Muslims.’ 
* Ever since 9/11, the vast majority of Muslims have been continually repeating that they oppose violent extremism. Despite this, anti-Muslim prejudice has only increased to the point where it is now mainstream in U.S. society.

Anti-Islamic prejudice about terrorism has become a narrative fallacy - a flawed story that shapes our views of the world and expectations of the future.  Reiterated in political discourse and the media, it has become embedded and cemented to the point of being impervious to modification.  It has become the conditioned mindset and bigoted attitude of foreclosed minds.

The full article is available here

Monday, April 30, 2018

Trump's Fox & Friends Meltdown & House Republican's Attempt To Repeal Logan Act - Heather Cox Richardson

Trump and some of his people are afraid they are about to get outed as conspirators with Russian interests.

There was lots of mud in the water last week, but to my mind, the most notable things were Trump's meltdown when he called in to Fox & Friends on Thursday, and the next day's recommendation of the House Intelligence Committee that Congress repeal the Logan Act.

Taken together, they seem to me a pretty clear signal that Trump and some of his people are afraid they are about to get outed as conspirators with Russian interests, at least during the transition if not before.

The recommendation for repealing the Logan Act, coming from a committee that has been advocating for the president since the beginning, says more to me even than Trump's terrible habit of blurting out whatever is uppermost in his mind.

He is afraid Mueller's report will produce airtight evidence that he and his cronies conspired with Russia to win the 2016 election.

The full piece is available here 

Friday, April 13, 2018

No, Armed Jews Wouldn't Have Stopped Holocaust - Rabbi Jeff Salkin in Religion News

Jewish families surrender to the SS during the
suppression of the Warsaw ghetto uprising of April 1943.
The idea that Jews with guns could have made any meaningful resistance against Nazi Germany and its genocidal crimes is the cruelest, most cynical, most ignorant alternative fact there is. It is an insult to the memory of the 6 million Jews who died in the holocaust.

There is an obscene suggestion that anti-gun control activists like to make: If the Jews had had guns, they could have prevented the Holocaust.

We know why they utilize these arguments. They are eager to use any argument, no matter how fallacious, that will suit their political purposes. 

But the idea that Jews with guns could have made any meaningful resistance is the cruelest, most cynical, most ignorant alternative fact there is. It is an insult to the memory of the 6 million Jews who died in the holocaust.

Yes, there were Jews who rose up in armed resistance against the Nazis. Though the stories of Jewish resistance militias are legendary, and all of these actions were heroic, they were also, alas, failures.

It's not realistic to think that, even if every German Jew was armed, that they would have been able to stand up against an army that would decimate the armies of France, Poland, Czechoslovakia, Norway, Yugoslavia, Denmark, Luxembourg, Belgium, Holland, Austria, Greece — and that would invade the Soviet Union and get within 70 km of Moscow.

And beside that, it was not just the Nazi armies that were arrayed against the Jews. It was the entirety of German society — its universities, its medical profession, its industrialists, its scientists. The Nazis had willing, eager and enthusiastic helpers in central and eastern Europe.

The full article is available here

Thursday, April 12, 2018

Fact-Checking The Hitler/Gun-Control Analogy - Jeff Wiersma

Outside Germany, armed Jewish resistance to the Nazis merely underlined its futility, and the fatuity of the claims of anti-gun control activists. The Warsaw Ghetto uprising in the Spring of 1943 ended with 13,000 Jews dead, while the Nazis who crushed it lost just 20 lives.

Anti-gun control advocates are fond of suggesting that gun control enabled the rise of the Nazis and led to the extermination of 6 million Jews during the Holocaust.

Let's investigate some fact-checking done on this assertion.  First, let's turn to the work that Politifact did in response to this kind of assertion made by then-Presidential candidate Republican Ben Carson in October 2015. 
"While Hitler did attempt to take weapons away from Jews, Communists and Social Democrats, he also armed private citizens to better terrorize those same political opponents. To reduce Nazi gun policy to confiscation of weapons is to miss at least half the story.
Further, the gunowner registry from 1928 that Hitler relied upon was limited and far from comprehensive.  It was so incomplete, in fact, that many Jews retained their weapons.   
Dagmar Ellerbrock, an expert on German gun policies at the Dresden Technical University, states that, 'In my records, I found many Jews who well into the late 1930s possessed guns.'"

Next, let's look at some fact-checking The Telegraph did in response to the same assertion.
"Even if arms had been distributed to every member of Germany's Jewish population — which in the early 1930s numbered some 500,000 out of a total population of 65 million — they would have been severely outgunned by their vicious and far more numerous enemies. 
Outside Germany, armed Jewish resistance to the Nazis merely underlined its futility, and the fatuity of Carson's call to arms. The Warsaw Ghetto uprising in the Spring of 1943 ended with 13,000 Jews dead, while the Nazis who crushed it lost just 20 lives."

Sunday, April 1, 2018

Somehow Trump Still Enjoys Support Of 80% of White Evangelicals - Amy Sullivan

Trump owes his continued high standing among white evangelicals to the Moral Majority’s decades of fear-mongering about Democrats and religious liberals.

Generations of white evangelicals have been conditioned to see evangelicalism as so synonymous with Republican politics that the idea of a non-Republican political option for religious voters simply does not exist.

Mr. Trump owes his continued high standing among white evangelicals to the fact that nearly 40 years after the Moral Majority’s founding, the partisan meld is complete. Decades of fear-mongering about Democrats and religious liberals have worked.

It feels like it has gotten to the point where 80% of white evangelicals would vote against Jesus Christ himself if he ran as a Democrat.

Generations of white evangelicals have been conditioned to see evangelicalism as so synonymous with Republican politics that the idea of a non-Republican political option for religious voters simply does not exist.

The messages that have steadily cemented white evangelicals within both the Republican Party and the churches that marry traditionalist theology with Republican politics are so ingrained that - even those conservatives intellectually attuned and honest enough to lament the current state of American evangelicalism - can’t help reinforcing them.

The full article is available here

Tuesday, March 27, 2018

Why Did Democrats Lose the White South? - Kevin Drum in Mother Jones

Southern whites who wanted to keep Jim Crow intact had plenty of reasons to steadily desert the Democratic Party and join the GOP starting around World War II.

Modern conservatives are oddly fond of pointing out that it was Democrats who were the party of racism and racists until half a century ago.

There’s always an implied “Aha!” whenever a conservative mentions this, as though they think it’s some little-known quirk of history that Democrats try to keep hidden because it’s so embarrassing.

It’s not, of course. Abraham Lincoln was the first Republican president, and Republicans were the face of (Progressive) Reconstruction and voting rights for blacks after the Civil War. Because of this, the South became solidly Democratic (Conservative) and stayed that way until World War II.

But starting around World War II, Southern whites who wanted to keep Jim Crow intact had plenty of reasons to steadily desert the Democratic Party and join the GOP.

Democrat Eleanor Roosevelt championed the civil right of African American singer Marian Anderson to perform at Constitution Hall. Democrat FDR signed the nondiscrimination order for the national defense industry. FDR's successor, Democrat Harry Truman, integrated the military.

 And racist white Southerners gradually began defecting to the Republican Party. By the early 60s they began defecting en masse during the fight over the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

The full article is available here

Saturday, February 17, 2018

What's Behind Our Arguments About Immigration? - Christian Century

When we talk about the immigration rate, we're really talking about our most fundamental fears and beliefs.  Those these instinctual reactions aren't unpredictable, they do not necessarily make for wise public policy.

Each year the United States admits a little over 1 million immigrants. Is that too many? Opponents of immigration say it is.

The notion of “virtually unlimited” migration is largely a specter of Trump’s making. Family members are not automatically allowed to join a relative in the United States. There’s a backlog of applications; the wait in some cases is up to 20 years.

The stated objections to immigration are often that immigrants take jobs away from native-born U.S. citizens, that they put a strain on government services and the economy, that they increase crime, and that they overturn the norms of U.S. culture.
These concerns have been given consideration and scrutinized, and in each case, there is ample evidence that they aren’t valid.

People’s views on immigration might not be connected to data-based assessment of costs and benefits. They might be rooted in a general uneasiness about cultural change and the challenge of living beside people who are different.

When we talk about the immigration rate, we're really talking about our most fundamental fears and beliefs.  Those these instinctual reactions aren't unpredictable, they do not necessarily make for wise public policy.

The full article is available here

Wednesday, December 13, 2017

Overcoming Trumpism: A Strategy For Progressives - Rabbi Michael Lerner

It is precisely by acknowledging ALL the different forms of suffering felt in Late Modernism - even those who react to that suffering in hurtful or oppressive ways or materially benefit from the suffering of others - that we have the best chance of building a lasting transformation of our society to one based on justice and love.

One part of the strategy is to split the Trump forces; challenging the policies of the truly dyed-in-the-wool racists, sexists, homophobes, and Islamophobes, while responding with empathy, caring, and respect for those who are not.

The "nots" are those who have been moved to the Right by the deep psychological and spiritual crisis of Late Modernism, even though their economic interests are better served by the Left.

Among the pains of Late Modernism is economic insecurity, which used to lead to the creation of powerful labor unions and social democratic movements.  But in the past 40 years, there's been a significant increase in the degree to which people have come to believe in a self-justifying ideology of the capitalist marketplace - that we live in a meritocracy.

Those who aren't among the 1% who have benefited from exponential upward concentration of wealth in the last 40 years find their belief in a meritocracy giving rise to intense self-blame.

Yet ironically, at a fundamental level, most people hate being in a world dominated by materialism and selfishness. They yearn for a life in which love, caring, and contributing to the common good serve a higher purpose than "look out for #1."

The Movement Conservative/Fundamentalist Christian Right has offered that sense of community to many - but at the cost of embracing a message of right-wing extremism that blames the "other" as the reason that there is economic insecurity and that the world seems full of selfishness and materialism. The reason that people continue to cling to these beliefs is that they offer an effective - albeit distorted - way out of the often unconscious but pervasive self-blaming that results from the myth of Meritocratic Capitalism.

In a cruel twist, those who are victimized by Social Darwinist Corporatism are often taught to articulate their distress in ways that demean the "other(s)" who they've been told have victimized them (minorities, gays, immigrants, etc.) rather than the oppressive system itself.

...

The other part of the strategy is to correct the mistake that many high-profile progressives tend to make in shaming those who follow the misguided belief that fears and blames the "other"; think Hillary Clinton's awful "basket of deplorables" comment.

Those progressives engaged in this reactionary shaming only compound the distress of those who are already deeply engaged in self-blaming (even though it is often at a subconscious level). There is a marked difference between progressives correctly denouncing racism, sexism, inequality and dismissing the real socioeconomic distress of those who are taken in by the Right Wing's other-blaming rhetoric.

It is precisely by acknowledging ALL the different forms of suffering felt in Late Modernism - even those who react to that suffering in hurtful or oppressive ways or materially benefit from the suffering of others - that we have the best chance of building a lasting transformation of our society to one based on justice and love.

The full article is available here

Sunday, December 10, 2017

The GOP Is Rotting - Conservative David Brooks

The rot afflicting the current G.O.P. (as led by Movement Conservatives and Trump) is comprehensive — moral, intellectual, political and reputational. More and more former Republicans wake up every day and realize: "I’m homeless. I’m politically homeless.”

The Republican Party is doing harm to causes it purports to serve. If Republicans accept Roy Moore as a United States senator, they may, for a couple years, have one more vote for a justice or a tax cut, but they will have made their party loathsome for an entire generation.

The pro-life cause will be forever associated with moral hypocrisy on an epic scale. The word “evangelical” is already being discredited for an entire generation. More and more people look at the Trump-Moore G.O.P. and they are repulsed, maybe forever.

The full article is available here

Wednesday, November 29, 2017

Helpful Reactions When Someone Claims Sexual Harassment/Assault - Jeff Wiersma


Helpful public reactions when [insert name of PUBLIC FIGURE HERE] is exposed for sexual harassment or assault:

1. Wow. I’m really glad institutions are taking sexual harassment seriously.

2. I am thankful we are living in a time when people who speak out against harassment are receiving institutional support.

3. I know that for every person who comes forward with their experience, even more are silent and silenced. I hope one day soon that changes. I hope I can help that change.

Tuesday, November 28, 2017

Thoughts On Al Franken Allegations and Trump/Roy Moore - Jeff Wiersma


I’ve seen more “why should Al Franken resign when Republicans elected a man like Donald Trump and Roy Moore is still in his senate race” rationalizations lately than I thought that I would.

2 thoughts occur to me:

(1) Integrity means doing the right thing and isn’t subject to partisan preferences.

(2) Doing the right thing doesn’t depend on the timeline/willingness of habitual sexual predators like Trump and Roy Moore to admit their wrongdoings and do the right thing themselves.

Monday, November 20, 2017

The Religious Right Has Ended Up Being Very People They Warned Us Against - Jeff Wiersma


In my youth, Fundamentalist Evangelicals told me that “liberals” and the “gay agenda” would one day push for acceptance of pedophilia.

My goodness, how differently things turned out.

Even though this is the logical outcome of being corrupted partisans, it’s still incredibly disappointing and dismaying to see; though perhaps predictable after the Faustian bargain they made with Trump for a Pyrrhic Victory in the 2016 election.

Sunday, November 19, 2017

US, European Nations Slammed for 'Complicity' as Humanitarian Groups Demand Aid for Yemen

"The international community must break its shameful silence and use all possible means to lift the blockade on Yemen immediately," said the relief groups in their statement.

14 international aid agencies on Friday expressed that they were "appalled" by the global community's complacency regarding the humanitarian crisis unfolding in Yemen, and called for a resolution to the civil war that's gone on for two years—while in its own statement, Amnesty International called for an end to complicity in the conflict from the U.S. and its allies.

"The U.S.A., U.K., and France must immediately cease supplying arms to the Saudi Arabia-led coalition fighting in Yemen, which is impeding humanitarian assistance of items indispensable to the survival of civilians," declared Amnesty International.

The current famine and cholera epidemic in Yemen have both been exacerbated by a blockade that the Saudi-led coalition supporting government forces escalated 12 days ago.

The full article is available here

Tuesday, November 14, 2017

Evangelical Russell Moore Stands Up For Women - Jeff Wiersma

Conservative Evangelical Christian leader Russell Moore (who has forcefully and consistently rebuked Trumpism from the beginning) comes correct with what SHOULD be obvious to anyone who calls themselves a “Christian,” but sadly isn’t obvious as we’ve seen recently.

Attention Jerry Falwell Jr: this is how it’s done.

Monday, November 13, 2017

Thoughts On Fundamentalist US Christians & Their Often-Exasperating Political Opinions - Jeff Wiersma

It seems like every day, we see headlines about Fundamentalist Christians in the US saying and doing some truly unimaginable, abhorrent things. My thoughts ...

Trumpism - in all of its ugliness and malevolence, has turned society upside down. And as with most things that get turned upside down, things that have for a long time laid low at the bottom get brought to the surface.

I still call myself a “Christian” because it’s a lot easier to say than “a follower of the 1st Century reformist, anti-imperialist, pacifist, anti-legalism, subversive Jewish prophet Jesus of Nazareth who was murdered by corrupt religious leaders aligned with empire.”

But the twisted, misguided, and abusive caricature of Christianity that we have seen emboldened by Trumpism is something I literally fought for my life to break free from in 1999-2000.

With that out of the way ...


To those who aren’t part of my faith tradition ...

... it is vitally important to me that you know that those who hate, exclude, abuse, and dehumanize do not accurately interpret, understand, nor represent the teachings of Jesus. These people are profoundly lost, driven by fear, and are lashing out against all kinds of things that they’ve been wrongly shaped and molded to believe are their enemy. (And even if these imagined enemies were actual enemies, didn’t Jesus command that we should love our enemies? But I digress).

We are in a time of profound societal change and spiritual awakening. Those who have been programmed to fear change - specifically that threatens their hegemony/privileged position in how things have been - are a counter-awakening backlash.

However, I remain steadfast in my belief that it is never too late for people to change; because I did. I myself was once captive to this very mindset.

Also, there are a lot of principled, conservative Evangelical Christians who are opposed to Trumpism on moral grounds - and many spoke out against it as early as Trump’s entrance into the race in the early summer of 2015. Their mindset and hearts are not accurately portrayed in over-generalized characterizations of “conservative Christians” or “evangelicals.”


To those in my faith tradition who, like me, are dismayed at what is being done and said in the name of it ...

... based on everything I see, people who aren’t part of our faith tradition have tremendous respect for what Jesus taught and know that what is being done and said in his name is incongruous with those teachings. They see right through it.

This doesn’t mean that we should relent in assertive resistance to this most recent hijacking of Jesus. But be encouraged that this spasm of extremism and idolatrous worship of power, fear, and control are telltale signs that Christianity - like the rest of the world - is in the process of realigning with the shifting cultural tectonic plates from the Modernist era into the next era. We’re in the midst of a 2nd Reformation and, though this in-between time is difficult and fraught with seismic activity, the future is open to revitalizing and renewing our faith.

To me, that’s exciting - but I’m also deeply concerned about and aware of the real damage that has been done and could still be done by the forces of counter-awakening until this transition phase is complete.

Tuesday, November 7, 2017

A Year Later, Reflections On The 2016 Election - Jeff Wiersma

So it’s been a year since Trump won the election.

Looking back, I can see I was naive in my hope that - despite the evidence of four decades of hypocrisy and cynical partisanship by Religious Right leaders - those who dedicate an inordinate amount of their life pontificating about “morals” and “values” wouldn’t then vote for Donald Trump of all people.

And many of them - unfathomably - still support him.

I should’ve known better.  Much of the US Religious Right has a blind spot for authoritarians and demagoguery that is so large you could drive a Trump through it.

Tuesday, October 17, 2017

Religious Right Carries Its Golden Calf Into Steve Bannon’s Battles - Conservative Michael Gerson

“There is no group in the United States less attached to its professed ideals or more eager for its own exploitation than religious conservatives. For many years, leaders of the religious right exactly conformed Christian social teaching to the contours of Fox News evening programming.

Who would now identify conservative Christian political engagement with the pursuit of the common good? Rather, the religious right is an interest group seeking preference and advancement from a strongman — and rewarding him with loyal acceptance of his priorities.”

The full article is available here

Thursday, October 12, 2017

Hurricanes, Perpetual War Overseas & Imperial Overreach - Jeff Wiersma

Imperial overreach is often evidenced by endless and financial black hole militarism abroad and inadequate resources for disasters at home.

Trump Challenges Cabinet Member's IQ, Fights Senator He Needs. What Is Going On? - NPR

“Is Trump playing 3-dimensional chess, going off the rails, or just acting on instinct — or all of the above?

Is he serious? Is there any strategy to it all? Is it all a ‘ratings’ ploy? It’s hard to know. It's possible — as many members of HIS OWN PARTY now believe — that he doesn't know, either.”

The full article is available here