Judy Mikovits Didn't Discover Deadly Virus Delivered Through Vaccines, Wasn't Jailed For It - Snopes

Judy Mikovits - who was featured in a recently viral conspiracy theory YouTube video 'Plandemic: The Hidden Agenda Behind Covid 19' - did not discover a deadly virus delivered through vaccines and was not then jailed for it.

She was arrested for allegedly stealing equipment belonging to the Institute that fired her.

Fortunately, the video  - which had been widely shared on social media despite its obviously sensationalistic and preposterous title - has been removed from YouTube for violating guidelines.

The full article is available here

Conspiracy Theories Run Rampant When People Feel Helpless - Washington Post

The object of the conspiracy theories — the coronavirus — is, itself, the source of the undesirable psychological states that promote beliefs in conspiracy theories. Thus Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs are a self-fulling prophecy. 

Psychologists have identified a number of psychological traits that are related to conspiracy beliefs, including the predisposition to see systematic patterns where there is only random noise or to interpret coincidence as intentional cause.

But when it comes to a global pandemic — and the deaths, social isolation and collapsing economy that it has brought about — three other factors are key: uncertainty, anxiety and powerlessness.

The object of the conspiracy theories — the coronavirus — is, itself, the source of the undesirable psychological states that promote beliefs in conspiracy theories. In other words, coronavirus conspiracy beliefs are a self-fulling prophecy.

This is dangerous because belief in conspiracies undermines societal behaviors that are crucial to limiting the damage of the virus. Social distancing, hand-washing, and wearing masks in public all have the most impact at the outset of a global pandemic

Political and social leaders can combat pandemic-induced anxiety and uncertainty by visibly taking the threat seriously, including steps to promote public health and reduce the negative economic impact on people.

Even merely demonstrating that they are working hard to address the crisis and avoiding engaging in conspiratorial rhetoric themselves could limit the likelihood of the mass public turning further toward conspiracy theories for relief.

The full article is available here

There’s No Such Thing As "Judeo-Christian Values" - Charles D Dunst in The Forward

Rather than reference traditional and contemporary shared values between the 2 traditions, the term is utilized by those who wish to imply the existence of a contemporary cultural war and evoke the visceral responses that come from such war.

Sure, both Judaism and Christianity emanate from the Torah; there certainly are shared values.

These values, however, are not what the term​ “Judeo-Christian values” refers to.

Rather than reference traditional and contemporary shared values between the 2 traditions, the term is utilized by those who wish to imply the existence of a contemporary cultural war and evoke the visceral responses that come from such war.

The term, as used by the GOP, is not reflective of Jewish inclusion in Republican politics, but of an ideological strategy to unite 2 camps — the anti-immigrant nationalists and the evangelicals.

For anti-immigrant nationalists,​​“the promise of “Judeo-Christian values” implies a return to dominant whiteness.

For evangelicals, the promise of “Judeo-Christian values” implies returning Christian hegemony, privilege, and Dominionism.

Contemporary U.S. Jewish values — values which are largely liberal — are simply not reflected in the right’s usage of the term. The term is not one of Jewish inclusion and Jewish values, but of cynical Republican politics.

Using Judaism to posture to two groups – nationalists and evangelicals – whose values diverge so emphatically from those of the contemporary Jewish community is outrageous.

The full article is available here

Lockdowns Save Lives: The Evidence Is Clear From Around The World - Aria Bendix in Business Insider

Social distancing provided by the lockdowns has clearly slowed the spread of the virus.

Overwhelming evidence suggests that lockdowns help contain coronavirus outbreaks and prevent additional deaths.

China, Germany, and Spain all saw their number of daily infections drop off after lockdowns were instated.

"Social distancing provided by the lockdowns has clearly slowed the spread of the virus," Jeffrey Morris, director of the biostatistics division at the University of Pennsylvania, told Business Insider.

In Italy, towns with lockdown measures also seemed to fare better than those without.

"Clearly we need for society to practice new levels of caution in terms of social distancing, hygiene, and mask-wearing," Morris said. "Even they came at a great cost, Lockdowns achieved this."

The full article is available here

Right-Wing Pushing COVID Disinformation On Twitter Worldwide - Forbes

The U.S. right-wing has played a particularly important role in the rise and spread of various forms of COVID disinformation.

Conservative and right-wing voices play an outsized role in spreading mis- and disinformation online about the COVID pandemic worldwide.

The U.S. right-wing has played a particularly important role in the rise and spread of various forms of COVID disinformation. However, it is not just a U.S. online phenomenon, but rather a worldwide right-wing scourge.

A number of common themes and narratives are being pushed by right-wing Twitter accounts in the United States, Italy, and France in particular. These included racist and anti-immigrant themes and narratives, especially directed at China.

There is also a substantial overlap between right-wing voices promoting conspiracy theories and public health misinformation.

However, the campaign to push #FlattenTheCurve and related hashtags was successful for a time in mid-March. It was a small case study in the efficacy of science communication that attests to the positive, and likely life-saving, impact of credible information online.

The full article is available here

Eric Metaxas' Counterfeit Bonhoeffer - Richard Weikhart

Eric Metaxas simply does not have sufficient grounding in history, theology, and philosophy to properly interpret Bonhoeffer.

In the biography he wrote in 2010, Eric Metaxas presented a sanitized Bonhoeffer for evangelical audiences.

How did Metaxas get it so wrong? Part of the problem, perhaps, is that Metaxas simply got in over his head. Bonhoeffer was a sophisticated thinker immersed in early twentieth-century German philosophy and theology.

Bonhoeffer (like his mentor Barth) admitted that Kierkegaard was one of the most powerful influences on his theology, which means that Bonhoeffer was committed to an irrationalist, existentialist worldview that is quite different from the mindset of American evangelicals. Though most evangelicals probably do not know it, most Bonhoeffer scholars dismissively reject the idea that Bonhoeffer's theology is compatible with American evangelical theology.

Eric Metaxas simply does not have sufficient grounding in history, theology, and philosophy to properly interpret Bonhoeffer.

Victoria Barnett, the editor of the English-language edition of Dietrich Bonhoeffer Works, wrote a scathing review of Metaxas's biography. In her opinion, Metaxas "has a very shaky grasp of the political, theological, and ecumenical history of the period." She then calls Metaxas's portrayal of Bonhoeffer's theology "a terrible simplification and at times misrepresentation." [2]

Clifford Green, another bona fide Bonhoeffer scholar who has edited part of Dietrich Bonhoeffer Works and has written extensively about Bonhoeffer, has also criticized Metaxas heavily, claiming that Metaxas's biography should be entitled, "Bonhoeffer Hijacked."

Metaxas presented a sanitized Bonhoeffer for evangelical audiences.

The full article is available here

Bill Gates Has Become A Right-Wing Conspiracy Target - NY Times

Misinformation about Mr. Gates is now the most widespread of all coronavirus falsehoods tracked by Zignal Labs, a media analysis company.

Bill Gates, the Microsoft co-founder turned philanthropist has been attacked with falsehoods that he created the coronavirus and wants to profit from it.

In posts on YouTube, Facebook and Twitter, he is being falsely portrayed as the creator of Covid-19, as a profiteer from a virus vaccine, and as part of a dastardly plot to use the illness to cull or surveil the global population.

The wild claims have gained traction with conservative pundits like Laura Ingraham and anti-vaccinators.

Misinformation about Mr. Gates is now the most widespread of all coronavirus falsehoods tracked by Zignal Labs, a media analysis company.

The full article is available here

The U.S. Military's Hijacking Of Pat Tillman's 2004 Death in Afghanistan - The Intercept

It would take 4 years of digging, led chiefly by his mother; 7 official investigations; and 2 congressional hearings before some semblance of the truth surrounding Pat Tillman’s death was pried from the government in 2008.

From the outset, the George W. Bush administration and the U.S. military shamelessly ran with a fabricated account of Tillman’s death for their own purposes and benefit.

Within hours of his death, the military knew Tillman was killed by friendly fire, brought down by three bullets to the head let loose during spasms of wildly irresponsible but deliberate shooting.

Right away, the military lied to Tillman’s parents, initially telling the family that an enemy combatant killed their son as he stepped out of a vehicle.

The military kept the truth from them through Tillman’s memorial service, which was broadcast on national television.

And the military withheld key facts from the Tillman family even as it admitted the broad stokes of his death. It would take 4 years of digging, led chiefly by his mother; 7 official investigations; and 2 congressional hearings before some semblance of the truth surrounding Pat Tillman’s death was pried from the government in 2008.

Tillman’s mother laid much of the blame for the cover-up at the feet of Donald Rumsfeld, Bush’s secretary of defense at the time.

The full article is available here

The Small Business Administration PPP Debacle - Jeff Wiersma

The federal Small Business Administration's Paycheck Protection Program ran out of funding for their small business loans this week. This has left many business owners scrambling.

There are 3 major problems at play in this debacle.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Problem #1: Big businesses getting loans meant for small businesses.

A federal crisis fund of $350 billion established to keep small businesses afloat during the coronavirus pandemic ran out this week, leaving thousands of companies waiting desperately for help.

But several giant companies with hundreds of stores, thousands of employees, and whose executives make millions announced they'd received the maximum possible payouts under the small business program. 

"Unfortunately, they were in line as soon as the window opened for this program and took a lot of resources away from those small business owners where this was their only option," said Holly Wade, director of research with the National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) lobby group.

Big business already holds an extremely privileged position in our nation's economy.  To see them gobble up relief meant for small businesses which are the lifeblood of local economies is flabbergasting.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Problem #2: The crisis fund is out of resources and Congress still has not been able to reach a deal that would appropriate more funds.

Negotiations to refill the PPP purse are set to continue over the weekend. Republican have pushed for a straightforward bill to add $251 billion to the program.

Democrats have pushed to set aside a portion of the additional PPP funds for lenders that work with underserved communities, and also provide $150 billion for states, $100 billion for hospitals and an increase to food stamp allocations.

Yes, those things that the Democrats are pushing for to be included in the bill are all worthwhile and important, but why hold up an agreement to replace crisis funds if Republicans wouldn't agree to include those things? Small businesses need that money right away! It's so exasperating!

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Problem #3:  Our warped budgetary priorities as a nation mean that we will spend $718 BILLION on the military this year.

According to the Congressional Budget Office’s projections, if the plans described in the 2020 FYDP were implemented, DoD’s costs would increase from the $718 billion requested for 2020 to $776 billion (in 2020 dollars) by 2034.

Endless wars and empire (800 bases in 70 nations) do not come cheap.  How in the world can we justify that type of expenditures in the first place, let alone when we are in a public health and economic crisis.  War profiteering corporations have always had far too much influence in Washington D.C.  The 2010 Citizens United decision has only made the situation worse.

The "Government Tyranny" Boogeyman vs Social Darwinist Tyranny - Jeff Wiersma

If public servants failed to act in the interest of the public good, all of us would be left on our own against the tyranny of Social Darwinism.

Those who believe that various levels of government acting in the interest of public health is "tyranny" have an inadequate and misguided understanding of what tyranny is.

In a constitutional republic, various levels of government acting within their constitutionally-mandated roles to stop the spread of a deadly pandemic are not malevolently taking away citizen's liberty or trampling on their civil rights.

Though we should always be wary of authoritarianism, which desires totalitarianism over constitutionalism (especially with a would-be authoritarian in the Oval Office), it is inaccurate to label public servants acting in the interest of the public good as such.

More accurately, if those public servants failed to act in the interest of the public good, all of us would be left on our own against the tyranny of Social Darwinism.  The Social Darwinism would take on several forms, including the survival of those least-immunocompromised, the merciless and cynical forces of the financialized market, and potentially mob rule.

Of course, it should come as no surprise that those protesting social distancing are stirred up and organized by corporate interests like the Devos family's Michigan Freedom Fund, who see potentially diminished bottom lines as a higher priority than human life. 

Health Experts: Americans Underestimate How Long COVID-19 Disruptions Will Last - STAT News

By the end of April shouldn’t be anyone’s consideration at this point. We have to assume at the very least this is going through May.

"The Trump administration has consistently shown a desire to underplay the severity of whatever is coming. And they’re constantly adjusting that — as it becomes harder to deny the reality will be worse than what they’ve conditioned people for," said Jeremy Konyndyk, a senior policy fellow at the Center for Global Development."

A former director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Thomas Frieden, said this week that it’s understandable that people want to know when businesses can reopen and some facets of life can resume.

But he said the focus of public discourse now needs to be on the public health response, not the question of when restrictions can be lifted.

“Decisions to reopen society should not be about a date, but about the data,” said Frieden.

By the end of April shouldn’t be anyone’s consideration at this point. We have to assume at the very least this is going through May.

Experts are worried that if the current measures work, success could have a paradoxical downside: People who are still vulnerable to the virus will see the risk as over, leaving open the possibility of resurgent spread.

The full article is available here

How To Fight COVID-19 With All We've Got - Pro Publica

In an absence of an abundant supply of masks, both the WHO and CDC stressed how important social distancing was.

Since symptoms-based policies alone cannot be perfect, we need to turn to other strategies to catch the people who slip through the gaps presented by a broad “If you’re feeling unwell, stay home”-type recommendation.

After months of saying that healthy individuals should not wear masks, administration officials are now considering guidance for much broader, community-wide use of masks, Fauci told CNN on Tuesday.

In an absence of an abundant supply of masks — which, by the way, also need to be worn properly to provide protection — both the WHO and CDC stressed how important social distancing was.

Not only can social distancing protect you as an individual, but the better the general public is at adhering to these guidelines and staying at home, the less virus will be circulating in the public to potentially infect paramedics, grocery store workers and public works employees and other essential staff.

Increasing the chance that the virus will be “diluted” is important.

That means workplaces like factories and warehouses should do whatever they can to space out their workers, and not have meetings en masse in indoor spaces, where droplets are likely to persist and don’t have a chance to be carried away by wind.

Testing is critical, because it can let people know if they’re sick before symptoms emerge and prompt them to self isolate.

At a big picture level, testing helps public health officials know where the disease is spreading and better allow them to direct resources and responses efforts.

The full article is available here

Documented vs Undocumented COVID-19 Infection - Pro Publica

Substantial undocumented infection facilitates the rapid dissemination of COVID-19.

The W.H.O. so far has found few truly asymptomatic cases, in which a patient tests positive and has zero symptoms for the entire course of the disease.

However, there are many cases where people are “pre-symptomatic,” where they have no symptoms at the time when they test positive but go on to develop symptoms later.

“In some sense, symptomatic versus asymptomatic isn’t really the appropriate dividing line” for us to be focusing on, said Jeffrey Shaman, a professor of environmental health sciences at Columbia University’s Mailman School of Public Health. “The appropriate dividing line is documented versus undocumented infection.”

What he means by “documented” is people who are identified as being infected, either because they were sick enough to go seek care or were tested through contact tracing, which is when public health officials track down all the contacts of someone who tested positive.

The “undocumented” could be people who have symptoms but didn’t get tested, or worse, people who had no symptoms or such mild symptoms that they decided to just carry on with their daily lives.

“Maybe they pop some ibuprofen, but still go to work, still get on public transportation, still do all the things we normally do, and the consequence of that is those people with mild infections — as well as if they’re truly asymptomatic — are taking the virus out into the community, and they’re spreading it far and wide,” Shaman said.

Substantial undocumented infection facilitates the rapid dissemination of COVID-19.

The full article is available here

You're Most Likely Most Infectious With COVID-19 Right After Contracting Virus - Pro Publica

Studies are now finding that people are shedding more virus during early stages of the disease rather than the later stages.

A virus that spreads in the way that COVID-19 does already a recipe for a bad outbreak, but this coronavirus has another aspect that’s helping to amp up its contagion factor.

You’re likely most infectious right after you contract the virus, possibly before you know you’re sick.

Studies are now finding that people are shedding more virus during early stages of the disease rather than the later stages.

"Shedding" is a term used by researchers measuring the amount of viral RNA from someone who is infected, from a sample gathered via a method like a throat swab.

The high viral load early on in the course of disease for COVID-19 patients suggests that the virus can be transmitted easily, even when symptoms are relatively mild.  This finding could account for the fast-spreading nature of this epidemic.

The full article is available here

What COVID-19 Spreading Through "Droplets" Means - Pro Publica

Sneezing and coughing aren’t the only ways droplets get transmitted.

W.H.O. research shows that liquid droplets are necessary to transmit the virus, and they need to go from the infected person’s mouth or nose into someone else’s eyes, nose or mouth.

People can also get infected if they touch a contaminated surface where a droplet has fallen onto and then touch their eyes, nose or mouth.

But sneezing and coughing aren’t the only ways droplets get transmitted.

Droplets are not necessarily huge, like globs.  We release respiratory droplets when we speak. People clear their throat. Some people spit when they talk.

This doesn’t mean that the coronavirus is being transmitted as an “aerosol.”

It does mean that if you’re standing right next to someone who is infected and they’re talking to you, or if you’re in a room full of singers who are projecting their voices in an enclosed space, there are going to be droplets in the air, and yes, you could inhale them.

Experts say that if you have to leave home, staying outdoors is the safest bet, since open air can help to “dilute” any potential microbes that reach you.

Of course, this isn’t free of risk, so maintain a 6 foot distance, at least.

The full article is available here

What does a shelter-in-place order actually look like? - Boston.com

As already implemented in the Bay Area, the order generally requires residents to stay home and businesses to close, but includes a number of exceptions for what’s considered “essential” needs and services. Those at “high risk of severe illness from COVID-19” are “urged” to only leave their homes for medical care.

For most individuals, that means you can still leave the house to get food, whether it be from a supermarket, a corner store, or a restaurant or cafe for takeout (they also are allowed to deliver).

Residents can also leave to go to the doctor (CALL FIRST TO SEE WHAT SCREENING PROCESS THEY HAVE IN PLACE) or pick up medicine to go outside to walk, run, bike, or hike — as long as they stay at least six feet away from other people.

The full article is available here

Man Dead From Taking Chloroquine Product After Trump Touts Drug For Coronavirus - Forbes

When President Trump incorrectly announced that the FDA had fast-tracked approval of the drugs chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine for treatment of COVID-19, he added, “The nice part is, it's been around for a long time, so we know that if it - if things don't go as planned, it's not going to kill anybody.”

The full article is available here

U.S. axed CDC expert job in China months before virus outbreak - Reuters

“Quick left China when she learned her federally funded post, officially known as resident adviser to the U.S. Field Epidemiology Training Program in China, would be discontinued as of September 2019, the sources said.”

The full article is available here

Fed law enforcement doc reveals white supremacists discussed using coronavirus as bioweapon - Yahoo News

“White supremacists discussed plans about using coronavirus as a biological weapon via saliva, a spray bottle or laced items according to a weekly intelligence brief distributed by a federal law enforcement division.”

The full article is available here

Was ‘Coronavirus’ Replaced with ‘Chinese Virus’ in Trump’s Notes? - Snopes

“The images are authentic and were taken by the Washington Reporter who tweeted them and published by the Getty Images agency on March 19.”

The full article is available here

Report Projecting Millions Of Deaths Changed US/UK COVID-19 Policy - NY Times

"Imperial is treated as a sort of gold standard, its mathematical models feeding directly into government policy."

U.S. officials said the report, which projected up to 2.2 million deaths in the nation, influenced the White House to strengthen its measures to isolate members of the public.

The report reached new alarming conclusions because of the latest data from Italy, which has seen a spiraling rate of infections, swamping hospitals and forcing doctors to make agonizing decisions about who to treat.

It wasn’t so much the numbers themselves, frightening though they were, as who reported them: Imperial College London.

With ties to the World Health Organization and a team of 50 scientists, led by a prominent epidemiologist, Neil Ferguson, Imperial is treated as a sort of gold standard, its mathematical models feeding directly into government policy.

The full article is available here

Fact Check: World Health Organization Test Kits and U.S. - Politifact

"No discussions occurred between WHO and CDC about WHO providing COVID-19 tests to the United States," said WHO spokeswoman Margaret Harris.

"This is consistent with experience since the United States does not ordinarily rely on WHO for reagents or diagnostic tests because of sufficient domestic capacity."

The full piece is available here

Trump’s COVID-19 Leadership Failure Stems From Massive Character Defect - Republican Peter Wehner

The president’s disordered personality makes him as ill-equipped to deal with a crisis as any president has ever been.

Trump’s massive failure in leadership on COVID-19 stems from a massive defect in character. Trump is such a habitual liar that he is incapable of being honest, even when being honest would serve his interests.

He is so impulsive, shortsighted, and undisciplined that he is unable to plan or even think beyond the moment. He is such a divisive and polarizing figure that he long ago lost the ability to unite the nation under any circumstances and for any cause.

And he is so narcissistic and unreflective that he is completely incapable of learning from his mistakes.

The president’s disordered personality makes him as ill-equipped to deal with a crisis as any president has ever been.

The full article is available here

Bethel Church Warns Faith Healers Not To Visit Hospitals, Citing Coronavirus - Sacramento Bee

“Bethel Church, which teaches that its prayers heal the sick and raise the dead, is advising its faith healers to stay away from local hospitals, citing coronavirus.”

The full article is available here

Who pays Trump's tariffs, the nation they are imposed on or U.S. customers and companies? - Reuters

Importers often pass the costs of tariffs on to customers - manufacturers and consumers in the United States - by raising their prices.

U.S. President Donald Trump says China pays the tariffs he has imposed on $250 billion of Chinese exports to the United States.

But that is not how tariffs work. China’s government and companies in China do not pay tariffs directly. Tariffs are a tax on imports. They are paid by U.S.-registered firms to U.S. customs for the goods they import into the United States.

Importers often pass the costs of tariffs on to customers - manufacturers and consumers in the United States - by raising their prices.  U.S. business executives and economists say U.S. consumers foot much of the bill through rising prices.

Chinese suppliers do shoulder some of the cost of U.S. tariffs in indirect ways. Exporters sometimes, for instance, are forced to offer U.S. importers a discount to help defray the costs of higher U.S. duties.

But U.S.-based importers are managing the higher tax burden in a number of ways that hurt U.S. companies and customers more than China.

U.S. companies and consumers paid $3 billion a month in additional taxes because of tariffs on Chinese goods and on aluminum and steel from around the globe, according to a study by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Princeton University, and Columbia University. Companies shouldered an additional $1.4 billion in costs related to lost efficiency in 2018, the study found.

The full article is available here

Defining Socialism, Democratic Socialism, and Social Democracy

If we are going to have informed discussion about politics and political theories, using the correct terminology and understanding their definitions is essential.

Social Democracy:
Supports economic and social interventions to promote social justice within the framework of a liberal democratic polity and a capitalist-oriented economy.

The protocols and norms used to accomplish this involve a commitment to representative and participatory democracy, measures for income redistribution, regulation of the economy in the general interest, and social welfare provisions.  (Citation)

Democratic Socialism:
Advocates for political democracy alongside a socially-owned economy, with a particular emphasis on workers' self-management and democratic control of economic institutions; either within a market socialist economy or some form of a decentralized planned socialist economy.

Although most democratic socialists seek a gradual transition to socialism, democratic socialism can support either revolutionary or reformist politics as means to establish socialism. As a term, democratic socialism was popularized by social democrats who were opposed to the authoritarian socialist development in Russia and elsewhere during the 20th century.  (Citation)

Socialism:
Encompasses a range of economic and social systems characterized by social ownership of the means of production and workers' self-management of enterprise.

Social ownership can be public, collective or cooperative ownership, or citizen ownership of equity. There are many varieties of socialism and there is no single definition encapsulating all of them, but social ownership is the common element shared by its various forms.  (Citation)

Romney To Vote To Convict Trump In Senate Impeachment Trial

Debunking The Viral Right Wing "AOC and The Blind Entitled Generation" Trope - Jeff Wiersma

Like most viral right wing memes, this trope is long on misplaced indignation and shallow ideals as well as short on factual backing and nuanced understanding.

An unfortunately popular right wing trope making the rounds on social media - which claims that AOC and young people are blind to prosperity - is rife with upper middle class privilege.

It's hamstrung by a very short-term/limited concept of what should lead to enjoyment and fulfillment in today's world; namely disposable consumer items whose exploitative costs, in both human suffering and ecological degradation, are kept out of sight and mind by corporations who privatize the profits and socialize the costs to the public.

Perhaps we can forgive the author’s naïveté, as her rhetoric and talking points are indicative of someone whose views of the world at large are the result of the misinformation and propaganda that is right wing media. I can empathize with that state of misunderstanding, because that was me at one point in my life too. But that's only a reason, not an excuse, for ignorance.

Like most viral right wing memes, it's long on misplaced indignation and shallow ideals as well as short on factual basis and nuanced understanding.

Anyways ...

(1) The statistical data on the cost of living vs wages for those not in the top 1% verify that AOC is right about an entire generation being left behind. I desperately wish that wasn’t the case, since I am a part of that cohort!

(2) Further, her fear-mongering about capitalism ”being destroyed” is weak tea. She doesn’t see the distinction between aristocratic democratic capitalism and social democratic capitalism. She’d be well served to take a course in Comparative European Politics.

(3) She’s dismissive of an entire generation, as though they aren’t still bleeding out from the Great Recession, as though haven’t watched their parents’ generation sell out the earth’s climate for consumerism and fossil fuels, and as though their government’s budget hasn’t been pillaged for $6 trillion dollars worth of endless wars that are unwinnable and won’t defeat terrorism.

The screed can be viewed here

Genocide Expert: In U.S., Precursor Events Are In Motion - Brynn Tannehill

Are you worried about the United States yet? You probably should be.

I study genocide. It's been a theme in my academic endeavours for nearly 30 years. More accurately, I study the conditions in the lead up to genocide.

Whether it's acts of military aggression, bellicose leaders, assassinating journalists, putting foreign nationals in filthy over crowded camps that are black holes; the country on the verge of genocide is looking to see if they can provoke a reaction. It almost never comes.

At some point, the government determines or realizes that no one will intervene, and that there's no additional consequences to moving to the next steps: where they move to planning on how to get rid of the targeted population.

Are you worried about the United States yet? You probably should be.

Because I am very, very worried. I am not saying it will definitely happen, but the necessary conditions are there, and many of the precursor events are in motion.

The full article is available here

Several Right Wing Media Outlets Distort Facts on Australian Wild Fires - FactCheck.org

Various claims online (Prager U, Rupert Murdoch's media empire) suggest that climate change hasn’t contributed to the bushfires ravaging the East Coast of Australia, pinning the blame instead on arson.

Those claims distort the facts.

The full article is available here

The 2nd Amendment Doesn’t Give You The Right To Own A Gun - Brett Arends

The Second Amendment is an instrument of government. It’s not about hunting or gun collecting or carrying your pistol into the saloon.

In Federalist No. 29 of the Federalist Papers, Alexander Hamilton explained at great length precisely what a “well-regulated militia” was, why the Founding Fathers thought we needed one, and why they wanted to protect it from being disarmed by the federal government.

It should be a properly constituted, ordered and drilled (“well-regulated”) military force, organized state by state, explained Hamilton. Each state militia should be a “select corps,” “well-trained” and able to perform all the “operations of an army.”

The militia needed “uniformity in … organization and discipline,” wrote Hamilton, so that it could operate like a proper army “in camp and field,” and so that it could gain the “essential … degree of proficiency in military functions.”

And although it was organized state by state, it needed to be under the explicit control of the national government. The “well-regulated militia” was under the command of the president. It was “the military arm” of the government.

The one big difference between this militia and a professional army? It shouldn’t be made up of full-time professional soldiers, said the Founding Fathers. Such soldiers could be used against the people as King George had used his mercenary Redcoats. Instead, the American republic should make up its military force from part-time volunteers drawn from regular citizens. Such men would be less likely to turn on the population.

And the creation of this “well-regulated militia,” aka the National Guard, would help safeguard the freedom of the new republic because it would make the creation of a professional, mercenary army “unnecessary,” wrote Hamilton. “This appears to me the only substitute that can be devised for a standing army, and the best possible security against it,” he wrote.

That was the point. And that was why they wanted to make sure it couldn’t be disarmed by the federal government: So a future “tyrant” couldn’t disarm the National Guard, and then use a mercenary army to impose martial law.

The full article is available here

The Rise of Skywalker Is A Let Down - Pop Matters

While The Force Awakens adequately established the franchise, Rian Johnson's poor middle film was a destabilizing effort that put too much demand on this, the final chapter. Abrams is left only to conclude his expansion venture with what is a frustrating and unremarkable experience.

The struggle of both Rian Johnson in Episode 8 and JJ Abrams in Episode 9 to answer the question of how to tell the story post-episode VI raises another pertinent issue with such film-making sagas: understanding the time and space of the story itself.

While The Force Awakens adequately established the franchise, Rian Johnson's poor middle film was a destabilizing effort that put too much demand on this, the final chapter. Unlike Abrams' earlier success, the pressure this time around is too much for him to overcome. He is left only to conclude his expansion venture with what is a frustrating and unremarkable experience.

Abrams and his writers added a new problem by reintroducing Emperor Palpatine as this trilogy's arch-villain, as he was in the previous two trilogies. In Episode VI, Return of the Jedi, Darth Vader had tossed Palpatine down a skyscraper-sized elevator shaft.  Are we to suppose it had been a soft landing? More than likely, Abrams et al. hope we won't suppose anything.

Reprisals by just about every cast member in the saga will either titillate or irritate depending on viewer disposition, especially since most of these cameos are inessential to the immediate action. As force-ghosts and SGI allows, the dead never have to remain dead; they enter a digitalized holding cell to be recycled ad infinitum for Disney's profit.

This parlor trick results in (a) whatever heroic act a character undertook in previous films being rendered utterly meaningless (b) any death of a current film's character being stripped of any poignancy because we've grown wise to the fact that this trilogy will drag them back into the story.

The full article is available here

White House Aides Tried To Talk Trump Out of Withholding Ukraine Aid - New York Times

Trump’s top national security advisers tried to talk him out of withholding the money. 

It has been revealed that President Trump demanded that the Pentagon withhold money from Ukraine at a crucial time in its war with Russia.  Trump’s own top national security advisers tried to talk him out of his determination to withhold the money.

Defense Secretary Mark Esper, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, and National Security Advisor John Bolton met with Trump together to convince him to release the aid because it served American interests. He refused.

It is no wonder Trump does not want any of them to testify. I seems safe to exclude the possibility that their testimony would exonerate him.

The full article is available here

Anguish & Anger From Navy SEALs Who Turned In Edward Gallagher - NY Times

Video interviews and group texts obtained by The Times show men describing their platoon leader in grim terms.

Fellow Navy SEAL's dire descriptions of Chief Gallagher, who had eight combat deployments and sometimes went by the nickname Blade, are in marked contrast to Mr. Trump’s portrayal of him at a recent political rally in Florida as one of “our great fighters.”

Video interviews and group texts obtained by The Times show men describing their platoon leader in grim terms.

“The guy is freaking evil,” Special Operator Miller told investigators. “The guy was toxic,” Special Operator First Class Joshua Vriens, a sniper, said in a separate interview.

“You could tell he was perfectly O.K. with killing anybody that was moving,” Special Operator First Class Corey Scott, a medic in the platoon, told the investigators.

The video interviews and private group text conversations obtained by The Times do not reveal any coordinated deception among the SEALs in the chief’s platoon.  Instead, they show men who were hesitant to come forward, but who urged one another to resist outside pressure and threats of violence, and to be honest.

The full article is available here

How Fascism Works: Fascism, Truth, and Trump - Yale professor Jason Stanley

The full article is available here

Trump Impeachment Is A Victory For Our Republic, But Struggle To Keep Republic Goes On - Jeff Wiersma

Trump's impeachment is worth celebrating due to the sovereignty of our constitution and the rule of law being reaffirmed.  The participation in our democracy, by Republicans and Democrat alike, from which impeachment resulted is what gives me reason to be optimistic.

Trump's impeachment is a poignant reminder that voting matters, as the oversight which lead to impeachment was only made possible by the House coming under Democratic control as a result of the 2018 midterm elections.

However, celebration of Trump's impeachment should be tempered with the acknowledgement that it never should've needed to come to this. Trump’s campaign and administration have been an undemocratic, malevolent, and incompetent edifice of lies, and one that - until impeachment - plowed undeterred through other protections designed by the founders to contain both despots and the tyranny of factions they are prone to create.
Most importantly, the edifice of lies that is Trump is still supported by 35-40% of the U.S. electorate. (While that is certainly better than a majority of the electorate supporting Trump, it is a significant amount of the U.S. populace).  This remains a legitimate reason to be concerned about the well-being of our republic and our societal discourse.

The takeaway = impeachment is a short term victory, but the struggle to keep our republic goes on.

Fact Check: Yes, ICE Refused Flu Shot Vaccine/Administering, Which Doctors Donated, For Detainees - Truth or Fiction

Claim: "U.S. border agencies have refused donations of flu shot vaccines for immigrant detainees, despite in-custody deaths due to influenza."

Rating: "True."

By the end of the federal fiscal year in September 2019, at least three immigrant children had died of the flu in federal custody, including a sixteen-year-old boy whose May 2019 death in Border Patrol custody was caught on video, which was obtained months later by investigative journalists.

In November 2019, the Los Angeles Times reported that border agencies refused donations of flu shot vaccines as well as the services of doctors to administer them.

The full article is available here

Trump and AG Barr Claim IG Report Says Exact Opposite of What It Really Says - Andrew Prokop

The inspector general failed to find wrongdoing in the FBI’s opening of the Russia investigation. Donald Trump and his Attorney General Bill Barr didn’t like that.

Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz has completed his lengthy review of the FBI’s counterintelligence investigation into links between the Trump campaign and Russia — and his report, released Monday, fails to back up President Donald Trump’s conspiracy theories about a “deep state” plot against him.

In the report, Horowitz wrote that the decision to open the investigation “complied with [Justice] Department and FBI policies.” And, he said, he did not conclude that top officials were driven by “political bias or improper motivation” in doing so.

Horowitz’s report does not confirm any of the theories that Trump and his people have floated and outright debunks some.

The inspector general failed to find wrongdoing in the FBI’s opening of the Russia investigation. Donald Trump and his Attorney General Bill Barr didn’t like that. Instead of disputing the report, Trump and Barr announced that it said the exact opposite of what it actually did.

This development suggests we are entering a new phase of disinformation, when Trumpians no longer try to spin facts but simply make their own and sell their false narrative.

The full article is available here

Columbus' True Legacy = Slavery and Genocide - Eric Kasum

“Such inhumanities and barbarisms were committed in my sight as no age can parallel," De Las Casas wrote.

One of Columbus' men, Bartolome De Las Casas, was so mortified by Columbus' brutal atrocities against the native peoples, that he quit working for Columbus and became a Catholic priest.

He described how the Spaniards under Columbus' command cut off the legs of children who ran from them, to test the sharpness of their blades.

According to De Las Casas, the men made bets as to who, with one sweep of his sword, could cut a person in half.  He says that Columbus' men poured people full of boiling soap.

In a single day, De Las Casas was an eye witness as the Spanish soldiers dismembered, beheaded, or raped 3000 native people.

“Such inhumanities and barbarisms were committed in my sight as no age can parallel," De Las Casas wrote. "My eyes have seen these acts so foreign to human nature that now I tremble as I write."

The full article is available here

Trump publicly urges Ukraine, China to investigate Bidens - New York Post

President Trump openly called on Ukraine and China to investigate his political rival Joe Biden and his son Hunter.

“Well, I would think that if they were honest about it, they would start a major investigation into the Bidens,” Trump said when asked what he wanted Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to do when he sought the probe in July.

Trump then continued: “And, by the way, likewise, China should start an investigation into the Bidens, because what happened in China is just about as bad as what happened with Ukraine.”

The full article is available here

Federal Judge Blocks Trump Effort To Indefinitely Detain Migrant Families - CBS News

“A federal judge rejected a Trump administration effort to detain migrant families and children for longer periods of time than currently allowed, saying it violates the very court settlement the government sought to scrap with its plan.”

The full article is available here

Trump Told Russians He Was Unconcerned About Their Election Interference - The Hill

“In a May 2017 Oval Office meeting, Trump told Russian officials that he was unconcerned about Moscow’s interference in the election because the US did the same in other countries, an assertion that prompted alarmed officials to limit access to the remarks.”

The full article is available here

NRA Acted As A 'Foreign Asset' To Russia Before 2016 Election - The Guardian

“Drawing on contemporaneous emails and private interviews, an 18-month probe found that the NRA underwrote political access for Russian nationals Maria Butina and Alexander Torshin more than previously known — even though the two had declared their ties to the Kremlin.”

The full article is available here

Alleged cover-up, secret server and more in Trump whistleblower complaint - CNBC

Trump is abusing the power of his office, soliciting foreign interference in our elections, running a shadow foreign policy via a civilian with no known security clearance, and covering up evidence of his actions.

The full article is available here

Trump Offered His State Department's Assistance to Ukraine to Dig Up Dirt on Biden - Washington Post

The transcript shows Trump urging Ukraine to work with Atty Gen. Barr and Rudy Giuliani in pursuit of dirt on political opponents and bashing US officials. It shows a president with little concern for U.S. interests, only his own.

The full article is available here

Why Is Greta Thunberg Scary To Certain Men? - Irish Times

“Greta Thunberg hints at the emergence of new kind of power, a convergence of youth, popular protest, and irrefutable science. And for her loudest detractors, she also represents something else: the sight of their impending obsolescence hurtling towards them.”

The full article is available here

Explainer: The Trump Whistleblower Scandal - Reuters

The whistle-blower's complaint, which has not yet been turned over to Congress, involved communications with a foreign leader and a “promise” made by Trump, with the whistle-blower's allegations centering on Ukraine.

Donald Trump is in a standoff with leaders of the Democratic-controlled U.S. House of Representatives over a whistle-blower complaint from within the intelligence community. 

The whistle-blower's complaint, which has not yet been turned over to Congress, involved communications with a foreign leader and a “promise” made by Trump, with the whistle-blower's allegations centering on Ukraine.

Michael Atkinson, inspector general for the U.S. Intelligence Community, is tasked with determining if a complaint is credible and involves an urgent concern. If it meets these requirements, Atkinson is required to pass it along to the acting director of National Intelligence, Joseph Maguire, who in turn “shall” forward it within seven days to the congressional intelligence committees. 

Atkinson has said in a letter to congressional leaders there were reasonable grounds to think the Aug. 12 whistle-blower complaint was credible and involved an urgent concern, and forwarded it to Maguire.  After consulting with lawyers from Trump's Justice Department, Maguire blocked the complaint from being forwarded to Congress, effectively overriding Atkinson.

Dan Meyer, a former head of the intelligence community whistle-blowing program, said Maguire’s decision to withhold the whistle-blower's complaint from Congress was unprecedented.

“This has never happened before,” said Meyer, a managing partner at the law firm Tully Rinckey.

The full article is available here

U.S. Has Spent 6 Trillion On Wars That Killed Half A Million Since 9/11 - Newsweek

The United States has spent nearly $6 trillion on wars that directly contributed to the deaths of around 500,000 people since the 9/11 attacks of 2001.

Brown University's Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs published its annual "Costs of War" report Wednesday, taking into consideration the Pentagon's spending and its Overseas Contingency Operations account, as well as "war-related spending by the Department of State, past and obligated spending for war veterans' care, interest on the debt incurred to pay for the wars, and the prevention of and response to terrorism by the Department of Homeland Security."

The United States has spent nearly $6 trillion on wars that directly contributed to the deaths of around 500,000 people since the 9/11 attacks of 2001.

The final count revealed, "The United States has appropriated and is obligated to spend an estimated $5.9 trillion (in current dollars) on the war on terror through Fiscal Year 2019, including direct war and war-related spending and obligations for future spending on post 9/11 war veterans."

"In sum, high costs in war and war-related spending pose a national security concern because they are unsustainable," the report concluded. "The public would be better served by increased transparency and by the development of a comprehensive strategy to end the wars and deal with other urgent national security priorities."

The report found that the "US military is conducting 'counter-terror' activities in 76 countries, or about 39% of the world's nations, vastly expanding [its mission] across the globe." In addition, these operations "have been accompanied by violations of human rights and civil liberties, in the US and abroad."

The full article is available here

Debunking The 9/11 Myths - Popular Mechanics

Following the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks against the United States, a wave of conspiracy theories swept the nation. The destruction of the Twin Towers in New York City was an inside job, they claimed, the work of the federal government, and "truthers" filled the internet with supposed proof of the vast conspiracy.

It was in this climate that Popular Mechanics took on the task of debunking the myths about the 9/11 attacks. Our first report appeared as the cover story for the March 2005 issue.

The reporting grew into a 2006 book with a forward by Sen. John McCain, which was updated with a new version in 2011.

To investigate 16 of the most prevalent claims made by conspiracy theorists, Popular Mechanics assembled a team of nine researchers and reporters who, together with PM editors, consulted more than 70 professionals in fields that form the core content of this magazine, including aviation, engineering and the military.

In the end, we were able to debunk each of these assertions with hard evidence and a healthy dose of common sense.

We learned that a few theories are based on something as innocent as a reporting error on that chaotic day.

Others are the byproducts of cynical imaginations that aim to inject suspicion and animosity into public debate. Only by confronting such poisonous claims with irrefutable facts can we understand what really happened on a day that is forever seared into world history.

The full article is available here