Yet conservatives continue to hype the extremely rare occurrence of election fraud as if it were a widespread problem and is somehow responsible for the election of Obama. And there is evidence that they’ve been successful in pushing this fact-free narrative among the broader public.
In 2009, Peter Dreier and Christopher Martin of Occidental College studied the media coverage of ACORN during the 2008 election and concluded:
- 82.8% of the stories failed to mention that actual voter fraud is very rare
- 80.3% of the stories failed to mention that ACORN was reporting registration irregularities to authorities, as required by law
- 85.1% of the stories about ACORN failed to note that ACORN was acting to stop incidents of registration problems by its (mostly temporary) employees when it became aware of these problems
- 95.8% of the stories failed to provide deeper context, especially efforts by Republican Party officials to use allegations of "voter fraud" to dampen voting by low‐income and minority Americans, including the firing of U.S. Attorneys who refused to cooperate with the politicization of voter-fraud accusations—firings that ultimately led to the resignation of U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales
The full article is available here